Linx 4 pay jez
- Tessy P. Roof
- Mar 14, 2022
- 5 min read
Updated: Apr 23, 2022
Chiari syring handbook link
In re the disappeared
P. 4 - specify for both
mother and to get out of paying child support.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/UDGptn4imLR55FpL7
Tracy search for KK
uncle mark search
bio tyo mom lqar messqge
bio that jk un fbz
sarah we dont know location
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KiJUQq1IksAReo8Ukec1cC5cRqZtc0rm/view?usp=drivesdk me 8.28 demand for communication, frankie location, call out for pretending to be frankie on frankiefr Facebook messenger account
me re frankie demand 8.29
me 8.30 & 8.31 re legal right to talk to my child
8.31 at 2:20 PMsent me pic of new order
I dispute owing any of the child support claimed in the 2018-dated documents for reasons including but not limited to the following:
(a) the order was incorrectly calculated,
(b) the order was illegitimately obtained by the moving party (the child's father), and
(c) Child #1 and I are actually victims of an extreme incidence of tortious custodial interference (parental kidnapping) at the hands of the moving party.
After hearing my argument and reviewing the evidence I offer in its support, the Court should enter counterclaim judgment for damages against Jerry Jr. for the permanent, irreversible physical and emotional damage done to our child, as well as the life-encompassing damage intentionally done to me through Jerry Jr.'s interference, calculated manipulation, and concealment of our daughter.
Before he denied her access to observation and care from the spine specialist surgeon and the neurosurgeon that had separately operated on her just 2 years before her arrival in Fairbanks (she was instructed to attend, and had been attending, appointments with each provider separately twice per year and as needed until she turned 18 (she was 15 upon her arrival in Fairbanks)), Child #1 enjoyed a day-to-day life that didn't include excruciating, debilitating physical pain. Because of Jerry Jr.'s indifferent ignorance, she was unable to access the medical care she needed for her spine while she was physically continuing to grow, and she presently experiences chronic back pain so severe that she can't sit upright or stand more than 20 minutes without suffering a sharp increase in her back pain that becomes her main focus until she finds relief from it.
(show radiology spine imaging & written results, attach medical articles about what results mean)
Jerry Jr. also intentionally robbed Child #1 of her education, one that she'd spent the majority of her life working toward completing, and the related peer-network of relationships that had already formed and that one would reasonably assume would be realized in the future.
Jerry Jr. vengefully executed a premeditated course of action that needlessly severed long-standing relationships with friends and family, and tyrannically removed Child #1's right to physical privacy and the ability to make any decisions about her own life. His selfishly-motivated actions effectively robbed our child, and myself, of the experience of the last years of her childhood, and the opportunities she would have had to naturally grow into adulthood with her peers.
Relentless psychological abuse perpetrated by her long-lost father deeply damaged her self-confidence, her trust in others, and in authority figures in general. After Child #1 was a legal adult, Jerry Jr. continued his efforts to exert control over her life, to include interference with Child #1's mail and theft of her DSHS food benefits. Jerry Jr. is indebted to us both for his intentional thievery and destruction of our daughter, my relationship with her, and her relationship with everything.
The defendant fraudulently misrepresented himself when he failed to disclose his criminal history, including multiple felonies, and charges entered against him for endangering Krystin and for domestic violence. Tess Aff. Ex. ___.
The defendant misled this court with regard to due diligence in his failure to seek out an effective service address for the Plaintiff. A court commonly assumes the responsible party in an action will perform due diligence as necessary; however, Jerry Jr. boldly declined to assume the responsibility that was assumed him, and one of the most basic procedures in a civil lawsuit, which every other person involved in a lawsuit is able to do.
A few weeks prior to Jerry Jr.'s secret filing for custody modification, the plaintiff initiated contact with him in hopes of the establishment of an amicable relationship between the adults in Krystin's best interests. Tess Aff. Ex. ____. After being contacted, Jerry Jr. sent multiple unsolicited communications. However, he didn't communicate any information about his motion to me. Id. Neither did he request any kind of contact information from me. Id. Later, the defendant insisted that a text sent on June ___ fulfilled civil procedural requirements of notice and service: ______________________________-________________
The defendant misled the court and allowed it to believe the conflicting contact information he provided for Ms. Fauver was effective for service. He intentionally avoided necessary procedures requiring notice and service and allowed the court to believe he had fulfilled all due process requirements, though in fact he had declined to serve the plaintiff or provide her with notice of his motion. Tess Aff. Ex. ___.
The defendant misrepresented the validity of his unserved and unsupported motion when he allowed the court to rule and issue an order without making it known that the plaintiff had not been given notice or served.
Jerry Jr. misrepresented the certificate of service form, signed and dated June 29 and filed on July 3, as a complete and valid service certification, when in fact what he filed was an incomplete document. TF Aff. Ex. 17____ p. 6. <Def Mo Docs> He intentionally left the area indicating the service method used incomplete as an attempt to avoid potential repercussions relating to his anticipated failed service/his failure to even attempt effecting service at all, to the plaintiff. The section requires only a simple check mark in one of two boxes (which indicate service by hand or mail, respectively). The chance of Jerry Jr.'s failure to complete that particular section of the service certification due to a mere oversight is far-fetched. The only part of this document that is not completed is located exactly in the center of the relatively small area required to be read and completed by the filing party and requires only a simple check mark in one of two boxes indicating how service was effected on the opposite party.
The defendant intentionally misrepresented the validity of his motion when he allowed the court to rule and issue an order without alerting the court to the fact that Ms. Fauver had not been given notice or served.
The defendant fraudulently misled the court when he presented it with false accusations about the plaintiff in his maliciously slanderous misrepresentation of her. The July 2017 motion he penned presented untruths about the plaintiff as fact, including but not limited to claims that the plaintiff had abandoned her child and that her child had been “taken away” from her by “Child Protective Services (CPS).” Tess Aff. Ex. ___.
Comments